W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xsl-query@w3.org > November 2016

Re: F+O spec : function finder

From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 23:10:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CADyR_r04=QSx3Ah1N8Xq3SF_+PitMZ-py0tKWM3Fa8ob1L7gJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org>
Cc: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>, Public Joint XSLT XQuery XPath <public-xsl-query@w3.org>
Hi Liam,

I've just pulled the following page together, listing functions from
different versions of F&O (and linking to the right specs) as well as
a few EXPath modules:


If there is some interest, I can try and see how this can be improved,
and include functions from XSLT, XForms, XQuery Update, etc.


Florent Georges
http://h2o.consulting/ - New website!

On 14 November 2016 at 00:00, Liam R. E. Quin wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 17:54 +0000, Michael Kay wrote:
>> I have experimentally replaced the "Quick Contents" index in the F+O
>> spec with a "function finder" dropdown above the table of contents.
>> Let me know if you have strong reactions either way.
> It's a good idea; soe relatively minor issues:
> I wasn't able to tab into it, suggesting there may be accessibility
> issues.
> I wonder if it would be better to have a page under www.w3.org/XML some
> where (or in expath) that pointed people not only to F&O but to
> functions defined in XSLT or XQuery?? E.g. there's no fn:current()
> there (of course, although I always wished that was part of XPath).
> The dropdown box partly obscures the heading "FUNCTION FINDER" for me
> (firefox).
> Does it work OK without JavaScript? It didn't seem to for me,
> suggesting the form should be inserted into the document using
> JavaScript.
> Liam
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:11:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:43:21 UTC