- From: Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:02:31 +0200
- To: "'Robie, Jonathan'" <jonathan.robie@emc.com>, <public-xsl-query@w3.org>
> ACTION A-641-04 (bug 29277) Jonathan to make the editorial changes needed. > Status: Pending; ETA 2016-06-21 Not sure it is the result of the current change, but I found a small typo in 3.1.5.1, list item 5.b.iii: "If F's implementation is implementation-dependent not an XQuery 3.1 expression" Do we mean to say here the following? "If F's implementation is implementation-dependent and is not an XQuery 3.1 expression" With, in XPath 3.1, the same missing words "and is", but there of course we say "XPath 3.1 expression". Or do we mean to say "or" here? I admit I'm a bit confused...
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 13:03:14 UTC