RE: Done: ACTION A-640-04, ACTION A-641-04

I found a few other editorial errors in this section. Instead of reopening the bug 29277 (I think we all want it closed ;), I raised a separate bug to track these minor editorial changes / suggestions. I think it captures better what I tried to say below.

Raised against XP31, but applies equally well to XP31 and XQ31.

See: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29701

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Abel Braaksma [mailto:abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 3:03 PM
> To: 'Robie, Jonathan'; public-xsl-query@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Done: ACTION A-640-04, ACTION A-641-04
> 
> > ACTION A-641-04 (bug 29277) Jonathan to make the editorial changes
> needed.
> 
> > Status: Pending; ETA 2016-06-21
> 
> Not sure it is the result of the current change, but I found a small typo in
> 3.1.5.1, list item 5.b.iii:
> 
> "If F's implementation is implementation-dependent not an XQuery 3.1
> expression"
> 
> Do we mean to say here the following?
> 
> "If F's implementation is implementation-dependent and is not an XQuery
> 3.1 expression"
> 
> With, in XPath 3.1, the same missing words "and is", but there of course we
> say "XPath 3.1 expression".
> 
> Or do we mean to say "or" here? I admit I'm a bit confused...

Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 14:40:45 UTC