- From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:13:50 +0100
- To: "Databinding WG" <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>
Original Message From: "Databinding Issue Tracker" <dean+cgi@w3.org> > ISSUE-49: is anySimpleType a Basic Patterns type? > > http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/databinding/issues/49 > > Raised by: Paul Downey > On product: Basic > > The xs:anySimpleType isn't well supported by many databinding tools. > > Proposal: > > don't include xs:anySimpleType in our basic patterns document My recollection is that xs:anySimpleType can be readily mapped to a string. More importantly it can be easily parsed as if it was a regular element/attribute value. On the other hand, xs:anyType (<xs:element name="x"/>) requires 'special' parsing and I would expect to be more problematic for tools. Pete. -- ============================================= Pete Cordell Tech-Know-Ware Ltd for XML to C++ data binding visit http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx (or http://www.xml2cpp.com) =============================================
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2006 09:14:12 UTC