- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:56:56 +0200
- To: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-xmlsec@w3.org
Hi Frederick, Is there a way to see the diff with previous documents ? Thanks Mohamed On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:42 PM, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: > I have been preparing the 1.1 Recommendations and associated Notes to publish this Thursday, assuming W3C Director approval. In conjunction with this I have also prepared to publish the 2.0 specifications as Working Group Notes. > > I need your help to check for any errors, especially with examples, formatting, acknowledgements and the content of the abstracts and status sections. > > I have completed validation, link, css, spell and pubrules checks for all of the drafts (though I might have missed something) > > Links to the pre-publication drafts are on the roadmap page - please take a look at the drafts to see if you notice any errors or omissions. > > 1.1 Publication drafts linked from here: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/wiki/Roadmap#Next_steps_for_XML_Security_1.1 > > 2.0 Publication drafts linked from here: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/wiki/Roadmap#Next_steps_for_XML_Security_2.0 > > Worth noting is that I believe I've carried the 1.1 XML Signature changes into 2.0, so the XML Signature 2.0 status section notes those changes. In addition, since XML Signature 2.0 is changing into a W3C Note, I updated the conformance section to add a paragraph noting the document is informative - please review that this change is adequate. I also changed the 2.0 abstracts to make it clear that the documents are informative. > > You might also want to check the 2.0 Test Cases document to make sure the examples look right. > > There may be a last minute update to the RFC 4051 reference in XML Signature 1.1 and XML Signature 2.0 depending on whether we obtain it from the iETF in time. > > Please note Thomas and I have agreed to not publish updates to the interop documents, preferring to keep them as stable publications. > > If you have any additional review comments to note formatting or pre-publication errors please post them to the public list by end of day tomorrow (apologies for tight deadline, draft preparation took way longer than I expected) > > Thanks! > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Tuesday, 9 April 2013 11:57:24 UTC