- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:05:31 +0200
- To: frederick.hirsch@nokia.com
- Cc: public-xmlsec@w3.org
I'd propose we keep the following substantive products starting up: - XML Signature and Canonicalization V Next Requirements - Design for XML Signature V Next - Design for Canonicalization V Next - XML Encryption V Next - XML Signature Best Practices Maintenance deliverables: - XML Signature Syntax and Processing - XML Encryption Syntax and Processing - Canonical XML 1.0 - Canonical XML 1.1 - Exclusive XML Canonicalization Version 1.0 - Decryption Tranform for XML Signature In terms of editing work, I suspect that it's not worth moving the maintenance deliverables to xmlspec. It will be worth moving C14N and Signature to xmlspec once we know what shape these deliverables take. I also propose that we use xmlspec for the Requirements. Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> +33-4-89063488
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:10:19 UTC