- From: David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:02:49 -0500
- To: <public-xml-versioning@w3.org>
Thanks everyone for using the public list. That really helps us (me) a lot. Best regards, David Ezell -----Original Message----- From: public-xml-versioning-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-versioning-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:22 PM To: David Orchard Cc: public-xml-versioning@w3.org; W3C TAG Subject: Re: terminology section and diagram for ext/versioning On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 11:57 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: [...] > I just checked them in and generated RDF: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.png > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.violet > revision 1.1 > date: 2006/02/14 17:36:59; author: connolly; state: Exp; I made some edits: ---------- revision 1.2 date: 2006/02/15 01:53:13; author: connolly; state: Exp; lines: +87 -75 changes to UML diagram: - factored Communication out of Production/Consuption; moved common language/text associations - removed space from XML Vocabulary name to make it fragment-friendly - fixed direction of Constraint generalizations ---------- still working on this other stuff... > and I'm starting to review it w.r.t. some earlier work I did on change > policies... > > [VM] formally defining W3C's namespace change policy options w.r.t. > recent TAG versioning terminology > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Sep/0136 > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/util/changePolicy.n3 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2006 15:02:57 UTC