RE: terminology section and diagram for ext/versioning

I've never been able to get CVS access into W3C, despite Ian and Hugo's
best efforts, so W3C CVS doesn't work for me.  I'll keep editing on my
machine and punch out periodic updates, typically when reviews are done.

I agree with changing the arrows on constraint.

I don't agree with adding communication and changing instance to text.
If we're going to start mucking with the communication part, I'd rather
have producers and consumers as first class citizens rather than arc
labels.

I factored out xml vocabularies from vocabularies to try to be
independent of XML as we talked about.

I attach my latest in png and violet formats.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:57 AM
> To: David Orchard
> Cc: public-xml-versioning@w3.org; W3C TAG
> Subject: Re: terminology section and diagram for ext/versioning
> 
> On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 11:13 -0800, David Orchard wrote:
> [text and a diagram]
> 
> Is that diagram the same one I saw a while ago? Ah... yes,
> it is. So it corresponds to the .violet that you sent before.
> 
> I just checked them in and generated RDF:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.png
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.violet
> revision 1.1
> date: 2006/02/14 17:36:59;  author: connolly;  state: Exp;
> from DO Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:48:35 -0800 , Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:13:26
> -0800
> 
> 
> and I'm starting to review it w.r.t. some earlier work
> I did on change policies...
> 
> [VM] formally defining W3C's namespace change policy options w.r.t.
> recent TAG versioning terminology
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Sep/0136
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/util/changePolicy.n3
> 
> Darn; telcon in 4 minutes... and I'm scribing...
> 
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
> 

Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2006 23:23:59 UTC