- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:22:02 -0600
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: public-xml-versioning@w3.org, W3C TAG <www-tag@w3.org>
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 11:57 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: [...] > I just checked them in and generated RDF: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.png > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.violet > revision 1.1 > date: 2006/02/14 17:36:59; author: connolly; state: Exp; I made some edits: ---------- revision 1.2 date: 2006/02/15 01:53:13; author: connolly; state: Exp; lines: +87 -75 changes to UML diagram: - factored Communication out of Production/Consuption; moved common language/text associations - removed space from XML Vocabulary name to make it fragment-friendly - fixed direction of Constraint generalizations ---------- still working on this other stuff... > and I'm starting to review it w.r.t. some earlier work > I did on change policies... > > [VM] formally defining W3C's namespace change policy options w.r.t. > recent TAG versioning terminology > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Sep/0136 > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/util/changePolicy.n3 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2006 04:22:12 UTC