- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:57:25 -0600
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: public-xml-versioning@w3.org, W3C TAG <www-tag@w3.org>
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 11:13 -0800, David Orchard wrote: [text and a diagram] Is that diagram the same one I saw a while ago? Ah... yes, it is. So it corresponds to the .violet that you sent before. I just checked them in and generated RDF: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.png http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.rdf http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.violet revision 1.1 date: 2006/02/14 17:36:59; author: connolly; state: Exp; from DO Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:48:35 -0800 , Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:13:26 -0800 and I'm starting to review it w.r.t. some earlier work I did on change policies... [VM] formally defining W3C's namespace change policy options w.r.t. recent TAG versioning terminology http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Sep/0136 http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/util/changePolicy.n3 Darn; telcon in 4 minutes... and I'm scribing... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2006 17:57:34 UTC