W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-versioning@w3.org > February 2006

RE: Names

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:52:22 -0800
Message-ID: <E16EB59B8AEDF445B644617E3C1B3C9CAD0E5E@repbex01.amer.bea.com>
To: "Misha Wolf" <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, <public-xml-versioning@w3.org>
Sure.  Hoylen and I did that for the Web services ext/vers use cases for
XML Schema doc..






From: Misha Wolf [mailto:Misha.Wolf@reuters.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 11:39 AM
To: David Orchard; public-xml-versioning@w3.org
Subject: RE: Names


Hi Dave,


Neither <first> nor <last> convey any semantics when it comes to names,
and the use of these terms promotes misunderstanding.  How about
<givenName> and <familyName>?  Though these too aren't perfect, they're
a lot more meaninful than first/last.





To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
Reuters Ltd.
Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 19:53:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:02 UTC