- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:44:08 +0000
- To: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4047 ------- Comment #1 from ht@inf.ed.ac.uk 2006-12-22 15:44 ------- I _think_ you've looked in the wrong place. Confusingly, there are _two_ schema docs called onPositiveInteger_maxInclusive003.xsd, one in datatypes/Facets/nonPositiveInteger, which is indeed OK, and one in datatypes/Facets/Schemas which is a) not OK and b) the one which is actually referenced from the testSet. . . This appears to be the case for many (but perhaps not all?) of the others you've listed. . .
Received on Friday, 22 December 2006 15:44:26 UTC