Re: Split spec

Alex MiƂowski <> writes:
> Looking at the standard step library, it occurs to me that the
> language "required" and "optional" feels a bit too constraining.  We
> might consider defining steps as a module:
>    * each set of steps would belong to a named module
>    * each module would have a URI
>    * there would be a required module (or set of modules) that a
> pipeline implementor must support to be considered conform ant.
> This would also give us the option of compartmentalizing certain XML
> micro operations vs larger operations (e.g. XSLT/XQuery) that wouldn't
> be relevant for a processor that did other content types.

I think that's an intresting idea.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676

Received on Friday, 14 November 2014 14:12:48 UTC