- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 10:46:09 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> writes: >> I've been looking at one of the use cases and realize it would be >> really, really nice if a step could output a reference: >> >> <c:data href="math.png" content-type="image/png"/> > > I wonder how that will play with the ideas Vojtech had about > handling multiple content types flowing through the pipeline. > >> That way p:store, etc. can return a standardized reference to a >> resource created. > > But p:store already has a standard reference: > > <c:result>math.png</c:result> Hmm... I wouldn't call that a standard way to represent a link. > >> It may be the case that c:data is the wrong element to use for this >> but it seems like it would be useful in some places where c:data is >> used. > > Do you have in mind that, like base64 encoding, this would be > "transparent" to the steps. That is that a step processing > > <c:data href="test.xml" content-type="application/xml"/> > > would behave exactly as if test.xml had been provided "inline" > (assuming test.xml exists and can be read, of course)? > I just want the URI + content type. Other behaviors might be warranted but that wasn't what I was expecting. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 17:46:44 UTC