- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:26:02 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 12:26:48 UTC
I just realized that the version attribute is problematic. It's already present on p:xslt and means something else. We could limit version to just selected steps (non atomic ones?) or we could rename it to 'xproc-version'. Or something. Suggestions? Also, does a p:declare-step nested inside another pipeline inherit the version on its ancestor? I assume it does... Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The only thing that makes life possible http://nwalsh.com/ | is permanent, intolerable uncertainty; | not knowing what comes next.--Ursula K. | LeGuin
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 12:26:48 UTC