- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:11:10 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Well, I think that we need to be clear on what we are talking about And frankly, on UUID, I have no idea about what it is and how some implementation can interoperate >From the hash algorithm perspective, I think that we should provide reference (at least informative) of definition of SHA1, CRC32 and MD5 Mohamed On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> writes: > >> this one still apply >> >> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Please add a reference to RFC 4122 > > Why? We don't say anything about urn:uuid: URIs, do we? > > I agree it would be nice to have normative references for the UUID step and > the various hash algorithms, but I don't think this is it. (Nor is it clear > to me what they should be from RFC 4122's normative references.) > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | My problems start when the smarter > http://nwalsh.com/ | bears and the dumber visitors > | intersect.--Steve Thompson, wildlife > | biologist at Yosemite National Park > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 14:11:46 UTC