- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:53:51 +0100
- To: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- CC: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Innovimax SARL wrote: > On 9/27/07, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: >> I think there are three options: >> >> 1. We say that implementations must not pass PSVIs between steps (which >> means that to support Schema-Aware XSLT 2.0, the xslt2 step itself will >> have to do schema validation; we've ruled out this option in the wording >> Alex quoted above). >> >> 2. We say that implementations *must* pass PSVIs (or XDMs, but in any >> case augmented Infosets) between steps (which is a fairly significant >> implementation burden, and I believe we ruled out early on in the process). >> >> 3. We say that it's implementation-defined whether Infosets or PSVIs get >> passed between steps, and provide a Note that describes the effect (as >> discussed above). > > If I understand your concern, I think this is the current status quo > See in A.1 > > # Whether or not the pipeline processor supports passing PSVI > annotations between steps is implementation-defined. See Section > 7.2.3, "XML Schema Validate". OK, good. Then hopefully this text'll make into the new section that Norm drafts. Jeni -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 19:54:01 UTC