- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:23:08 +0200
- To: jeni@jenitennison.com
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 9/27/07, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > > I think there are three options: > > 1. We say that implementations must not pass PSVIs between steps (which > means that to support Schema-Aware XSLT 2.0, the xslt2 step itself will > have to do schema validation; we've ruled out this option in the wording > Alex quoted above). > > 2. We say that implementations *must* pass PSVIs (or XDMs, but in any > case augmented Infosets) between steps (which is a fairly significant > implementation burden, and I believe we ruled out early on in the process). > > 3. We say that it's implementation-defined whether Infosets or PSVIs get > passed between steps, and provide a Note that describes the effect (as > discussed above). If I understand your concern, I think this is the current status quo See in A.1 # Whether or not the pipeline processor supports passing PSVI annotations between steps is implementation-defined. See Section 7.2.3, "XML Schema Validate". Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 19:23:20 UTC