Re: Speaking of in-scope namespaces...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> In 5.1, we say:
>
>   The select expression, if specified, applies the specified [XPath
>   1.0] select expression to the document(s) that are read. Each node
>   selected is wrapped in a document and provided to the input port. In
>   other words, ...
>
> Perhaps we should say instead:
>
>   The select expression, if specified, applies the specified [XPath
>   1.0] select expression to the document(s) that are read. Each element
>   selected is copied into a new document where it becomes the document
>   element of that document. The in-scope namespaces and base URI of the
>   original element node MUST be preserved.

I had intended this to be covered by my proposed general wording. . .
Did you think it insufficient to cover this case?

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG4+0ykjnJixAXWBoRAl76AJ4yTFE8OQIX0ALLZlmj3ADbCrcL+ACfVyE/
+OBbkao86qjoJtJltmtEwi0=
=HslV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Sunday, 9 September 2007 12:55:38 UTC