- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:10:48 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 7 September 2007 17:11:00 UTC
/ Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say:
| On 9/6/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
|> / Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say:
|> | p:unescape-markup must come from well-formed XML. As such,
|> | there can't be any undeclared prefixes.
|>
|> What about unescaping something like:
|>
|> <x:foo xmlns:x="someURI">
|> <notx:bar/>
|> </x:foo>
|
| That should fail to parse just like this does:
|
| <x:foo xmlns:x="someURI">
| <notx:bar/>
| </x:foo>
|
| I am against having namespace fixup here because we should
| be using an XML parser and that would be modifying the definition
| of well-formed + XML Namespaces.
Hmmm. Fair enough.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Look for the ridiculous in everything
http://nwalsh.com/ | and you will find it.--Jules Renard
Received on Friday, 7 September 2007 17:11:00 UTC