- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:10:48 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 7 September 2007 17:11:00 UTC
/ Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say: | On 9/6/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: |> / Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say: |> | p:unescape-markup must come from well-formed XML. As such, |> | there can't be any undeclared prefixes. |> |> What about unescaping something like: |> |> <x:foo xmlns:x="someURI"> |> <notx:bar/> |> </x:foo> | | That should fail to parse just like this does: | | <x:foo xmlns:x="someURI"> | <notx:bar/> | </x:foo> | | I am against having namespace fixup here because we should | be using an XML parser and that would be modifying the definition | of well-formed + XML Namespaces. Hmmm. Fair enough. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Look for the ridiculous in everything http://nwalsh.com/ | and you will find it.--Jules Renard
Received on Friday, 7 September 2007 17:11:00 UTC