- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 17:54:59 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 9/6/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say: > | p:unescape-markup must come from well-formed XML. As such, > | there can't be any undeclared prefixes. > > What about unescaping something like: > > <x:foo xmlns:x="someURI"> > <notx:bar/> > </x:foo> That should fail to parse just like this does: <x:foo xmlns:x="someURI"> <notx:bar/> </x:foo> I am against having namespace fixup here because we should be using an XML parser and that would be modifying the definition of well-formed + XML Namespaces. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Friday, 7 September 2007 00:55:19 UTC