- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:44:22 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> <doc>
> <para/>
> <para xml:id="_2"/>
> </doc>
>
> would silently produce
>
> <doc xml:id="_1">
> <para xml:id="_2"/>
> <para xml:id="_2"/>
> </doc>
>
> and that would be ok?
Yes. Like I said, if you are using this step twice in a pipeline, use
the prefix or suffix option to protect yourself. You will need to
anyway, if you want _guarantee_ no collisions.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG3/YmkjnJixAXWBoRAj4bAJ0cf1DCdN/5s8FLgt4S+AA8Tf0L8QCeIUFc
ThSS87hQjs2PXuWgBwu4Txo=
=WzZy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2007 12:45:09 UTC