- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:20:43 +0100
- To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
- Cc: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alex Milowski writes:
> We need to deleted dynamic error XC0021.
>
> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#err.C0021
>
> We can't require https because some implementations may not support
> encryption but we shouldn't require it to be http/https if an implementation
> can support another scheme (e.g. a GET request on a "file" scheme).
Hmm. I agree we should make https support implementation-defined, but
I'm not sure about allowing 'file'. . . All the options and so
much of the syntax of c:http-request and c:http-response is geared to
managing headers and encoding and so on. What's the use case that
p:load doesn't address?
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG3YXbkjnJixAXWBoRAoJ1AJ9lVbxNCE+GuTg+Up4xy4wCNVsgtwCfRqAJ
mECyvbBBTEQZgCylQSQAiCA=
=fVTh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2007 16:20:56 UTC