- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:37:07 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Norman Walsh writes: > / Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> was heard to say: > |> I think the paragraph that reads > |> > |> The result of the p:choose is the result of the selected subpipeline. > |> > |> is supposed to say that. I expanded that paragraph to read: > |> > |> The outputs of the p:choose are copies of the outputs of the > |> selected subpipeline. The p:choose has the same number of outputs as > |> the selected subpipeline with the same names. If the selected > |> subpipeline has a primary output port, the port with the same name > |> on the p:choose is also a primary output port. > |> > |> I amended the description of p:try in a similar way. > | > | That looks good. Sorry to niggle, but "a _copy_"? I guess you're being casual, but you don't really want to introduce the uncertainty which that will induce in implementors, do you? Why not "The outputs of the p:choose are taken from the outputs . . ." I'm now thinking I should search for 'copy' in the spec. . . ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHBPqTkjnJixAXWBoRAqrgAJ0fmFodPecsCsXTW4E90YQKdEy5yACfSYgR e+xusw9/OAXiEs8N2NnKQYU= =tPjT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 14:37:16 UTC