- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:45:13 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 14:45:25 UTC
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say: | Sorry to niggle, but "a _copy_"? I guess you're being casual, but you | don't really want to introduce the uncertainty which that will induce | in implementors, do you? Why not | | "The outputs of the p:choose are taken from the outputs . . ." Ok. | I'm now thinking I should search for 'copy' in the spec. . . It occurs in a few other places, some perhaps more appropriate than others. It seems (to me, on casual inspection) that rewording to avoid "copy" would make things less clear. But if you disagree... Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The stone fell on the pitcher? Woe to http://nwalsh.com/ | the pitcher. The pitcher fell on the | stone? Woe to the pitcher.--Rabbinic | Saying
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 14:45:25 UTC