- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:08:29 +0200
- To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 5/23/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote: > > On 5/22/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote: > > Some remarks > > > > 1) There are places where you explicitely say "sequence='no'" and > > "sequence='yes'" and some place where nothing is said. Please fill > > them or add a note if there is a doubt > > The default is 'no'. > > http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#p.input In such a case, please remove "sequence='no'" where they are > > > > > 2) I don't see the "auxillary port/non matched port" or whatever you > > wanna call it proposed here : > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2007Apr/0236.html > > I don't think we decided that. That should be on our issues list. Fair enough > > > > > 3) The order of attributes is troublesome in the spec > > In what way? They have been alphabetically reordered in your part of the spec, it's less obvious to understand that way > > > > > 4) You are still using variable p:position but seems like consensus > > was directed to functions (or am I missing something ?) > > I don't think we decided that even though you're probably right about > consensus on the e-mail list. Fair enough Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:08:48 UTC