Re: Spec Changes Implemented

On 5/22/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote:
> Some remarks
>
> 1) There are places where you explicitely say "sequence='no'" and
> "sequence='yes'" and some place where nothing is said. Please fill
> them or add a note if there is a doubt

The default is 'no'.

http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#p.input

>
> 2) I don't see the "auxillary port/non matched port" or whatever you
> wanna call it proposed here :
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2007Apr/0236.html

I don't think we decided that.  That should be on our issues list.

>
> 3) The order of attributes is troublesome in the spec

In what way?

>
> 4) You are still using variable p:position but seems like consensus
> was directed to functions (or am I missing something ?)

I don't think we decided that even though you're probably right about
consensus on the e-mail list.

-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics

Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:04:50 UTC