- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 08:40:45 +0200
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 5/15/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote: > Since we have an XSLT 2.0 step named "p:xslt2", maybe our XSLT 1.0 step > should > be named "p:xslt1". IMHO, we're giving XSLT 1.0 more status than > XSLT 2.0 by not ranking the step name. As time goes on, that might see > strange to pipeline authors. I completely agree. (In XPL, the component named "xslt" is running XSLT 2.0. If you want to run XSLT 1.0, you need to use a component named "xslt-1.0". I guess that shows the opposite bias.) Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms for the Enterprise http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 06:41:01 UTC