Re: Renaming p:xslt ?

/ Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say:
| Since we have an XSLT 2.0 step named "p:xslt2", maybe our XSLT 1.0 step
| should
| be named "p:xslt1".  IMHO, we're giving XSLT 1.0 more status than
| XSLT 2.0 by not ranking the step name.  As time goes on, that might see
| strange
| to pipeline authors.

I'm ambivalent, but I'm not going to argue against it. Should we look to
the future and name our xquery component xquery1?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Unless one is a genius, it is best to
http://nwalsh.com/            | aim at being intelligible.--Anthony Hope