- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:00:31 -0400
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
This is just ringing all sorts of caution bells for me. I say drop this attempt for V1. paul > -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Norman Walsh > Sent: Friday, 2007 May 11 8:36 > To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > Subject: Syntactic sugar for options: a failed experiment? > > Yesterday, we agreed to allow > > <px:step optname="value"/> > > as syntactic sugar for > > <px:step> > <p:option name="optname" value="value"/> > </px:step> > > All well and good, except: [lots of confusing examples.] > Allowing all of the different but obvious shortcuts would > make a mess of things, I think. > > Abort. Abort. Abort. ? :-)
Received on Friday, 11 May 2007 14:03:07 UTC