- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 10:32:09 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87647avuza.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say: | 3) No more parameter importing -- it likewise serves no purpose -- | all in-scope parameters are available to a step. I think that's too radical. What if I have a pipeline that invokes two stylesheets. Both understand the "foo" parameter but I explicitly do not want it set on one of them. | 4) But preventing parameter name clashes _is_ sometimes needed, so | replace p:import-parameters with | | <p:parameters from-ns="...." to-ns="...."/> I guess I could use this trick to work around it, but it seems really tedious. Better, I think, to make parameter passing to steps explicit. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Science is like sex: sometimes http://nwalsh.com/ | something useful comes out, but that is | not the reason we are doing | it.--Richard Feynman
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 14:32:19 UTC