Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 3.1 Comments

And what about

http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc
http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-step
http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-error

?

On 7/24/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> / Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
> | Should there be a note in this section about whether/how these namespaces are
> | likely to change?
>
> I think I'm inclined to change them to what we think will be the final
> URIs in the Last Call draft and then not change them again. I'm not
> sure what the final ones should be though. Maybe just
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2007/xproc
>   http://www.w3.org/2007/xproc-step
>   http://www.w3.org/2007/xproc-error
>
> ?
>
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There is no glory so bright but the
> http://nwalsh.com/            | veil of business can hide it
>                               | effectually. With most men life is
>                               | postponed to some trivial business and
>                               | so therefore is heaven. Men think
>                               | foolishly they may abuse and misspend
>                               | life as they please and when they get
>                               | to heaven turn over a new leaf.--Henry
>                               | David Thoreau
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €

Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 11:20:26 UTC