Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 3.1 Comments

/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| And what about
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc
| http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-step
| http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-error

Well, suppose we decide that XProc 2.0 is different enough from 1.0
that we want to consider changing the namespace. If we've parked
ourselves at /ns/ then we have to use /ns/xproc2 or something.

But, yes, /ns/ is the other obvious possibility.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Many ideas grow better when
http://nwalsh.com/            | transplanted to another mind than in
                              | the one where they sprang up.--Oliver
                              | Wendell Holmes