Re: First stab at p:namespaces

/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Even I can understand it :)
| So it seems sensible
|
| Little remarks
|
| * p:to-xml is a bit too generic, I prefer a p:context-node-to-xml or
| something like

I think with the addition of an 'option' attribute to p:namespaces, we no
longer need to to-xml step, whatever it was called.

| * we will need an ignore-prefixes attrbiutes on p:namespaces for
| exluding generic prefix (ex, my, etc...)

Right. Done.

| * it is said "This example will succeed as long as the
| caller-specified option does not bind the "h:" prefix to an
| inconsistent namespace name."
| I'm puzzled by this assertion, in my understanding the step won`t fail
| if *none* of the prefixes are differently bound (including "ex" and
| "p" in the example)

Right. But I don't think there's any possibility of any other prefix having
a conflicting binding in this example.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | No victor believes in chance.--
http://nwalsh.com/            | Nietzsche