Re: First stab at p:namespaces

Even I can understand it :)
So it seems sensible

Little remarks

* p:to-xml is a bit too generic, I prefer a p:context-node-to-xml or
something like
* The way you use p:to-xml indicate that option alreay travels with
their context (as you are able to put it into a file), so why do you
need this step ? why not only do <p:namespaces from="$match"/> in the
step ?

* we will need an ignore-prefixes attrbiutes on p:namespaces for
exluding generic prefix (ex, my, etc...)

* it is said "This example will succeed as long as the
caller-specified option does not bind the "h:" prefix to an
inconsistent namespace name."
I'm puzzled by this assertion, in my understanding the step won`t fail
if *none* of the prefixes are differently bound (including "ex" and
"p" in the example)

Mohamed

On 8/17/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> With two days of on-site stuff keeping me busy, I didn't make as much progress
> as I hoped, but I have rewritten 5.7, especially 5.7.3
>
>   http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#opt-param-bindings
>
> Comments (you got it totally wrong), suggestions (can't you make it sensible), etc.
> most welcome, as always.
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Those who in their youth did not live
> http://nwalsh.com/            | in self-harmony, and who did not gain
>                               | the true treasures of life, are later
>                               | like long-legged old herons standing
>                               | sadly by a lake without fish.--The
>                               | Dhammapada
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €

Received on Saturday, 18 August 2007 06:05:51 UTC