Re: Forward references

/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Hum...general rule ?
|
| Isn't all the business of output a forward reference ?

Yes, that's true.

| Don't we say that step at the same level see each other outputs (so
| backward AND foreward) ?
|
| Don't we say that p:log could reference any output (once), so to speak
| even the one declared after

Yes, I was just wondering if we wanted to make the p:output come first.
Now I'm guessing probably not :-)

| Where do you see it as a general rule ?

Well, in particular, p:declare-step and imported pipelines have to
come before the steps they define are called.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | I often marvel that while each man
http://nwalsh.com/            | loves himself more than anyone else, he
                              | sets less value on his own estimate
                              | than on the opinions of others.--Marcus
                              | Aurelius