- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 08:37:49 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 8/7/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | Hum...general rule ? > | > | Isn't all the business of output a forward reference ? > > Yes, that's true. > > | Don't we say that step at the same level see each other outputs (so > | backward AND foreward) ? > | > | Don't we say that p:log could reference any output (once), so to speak > | even the one declared after > > Yes, I was just wondering if we wanted to make the p:output come first. > Now I'm guessing probably not :-) > > | Where do you see it as a general rule ? > > Well, in particular, p:declare-step and imported pipelines have to > come before the steps they define are called. Ok I see your point, but I think what triggers me on this point is "before" I just don't think it is at the same level : they just have to be declared and the declaration happens to be in the prolog of the pipeline and for pipeline-library, i'm still unconvinced we should let user override definiion (shouldn't we ?) Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 06:37:54 UTC