- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 00:48:12 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Hum...general rule ? Isn't all the business of output a forward reference ? Don't we say that step at the same level see each other outputs (so backward AND foreward) ? Don't we say that p:log could reference any output (once), so to speak even the one declared after Where do you see it as a general rule ? Mohamed On 8/6/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > As a general rule, we don't allow forward references. Does that mean > that this is invalid: > > <p:pipeline> > <p:log port="result"/> > <p:output port="result"/> > ... > </p:pipeline> > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Until death, it is all life.-- Cervantes > http://nwalsh.com/ | > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 6 August 2007 22:48:18 UTC