- From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:43:51 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
... while looking at the spec. "subpipeline" is used as a non-terminal in the syntax section, but not defined there. There's a definition of the concept "subpipeline", but not of the term as used in the pseudo-grammar. It should be something like (p:step|p:for-each|p:viewport|p:choose|p:group|p:try)* Ports are named with the "port" attribute. I think "name" is a much more intuitive name for the name (and is consistent with parameter). The attribute names "source" and "step" for binding inputs seem a poor pair to me. Both in fact identify the source. "source-port" and "source-step" would be better. -- Richard
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2006 15:43:34 UTC