- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:39:07 +0000
- To: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Mohamed wrote: > It seems in those cases that we add an unneeded surrounder wrapper > because we don't care about the name That's true, but it's still useful to have a wrapper element in case you want to (easily) construct a sequence of documents from different sources. Instead, I think that we should say that <p:input> within <p:for-each>, <p:viewport> and <p:choose> does not have a port attribute (i.e. doesn't have a name). (I don't think we want people to reference that input anyway, particularly as they're going to get very confused between the for-each/viewport "source" and "current" ports.) Cheers, Jeni -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Friday, 22 December 2006 13:39:42 UTC