W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > November 2008

Re: [closed] Re: Handling of relative URIs in option values

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:07:21 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2fxlzpw52.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes:

>> > The prose for p:store is different because p:store behaves a bit
>> > differently if the 'href' option is not specified, but I 
>> still think the
>> > text should contain the same sentence about relative URIs 
>> as in the case
>> > of the other steps. Otherwise it is not clear what to do 
>> with relative
>> > URIs in p:store.
>> 
>> Now that href is required, I've fixed this one too.
>
> I can't remember what the final consensus was, but I think the prose
> about p:store needs to be updated as well. Section 7.1.24 now says:
>
> "The p:store step stores a serialized version of its input to a URI. The
> URI is either specified explicitly by the 'href' option or implicitly by
> the base URI of the document. This step outputs a reference to the
> location of the stored document."
>
> I think that "explicitly/implicitly" phrase should reworded to reflect
> the fact that "href" is now required.

Yep. Fixed. I simply removed the phrase.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Talk as if you were making your will:
http://nwalsh.com/            | the fewer the words the less the
                              | litigation.-- Gracián

Received on Monday, 10 November 2008 13:09:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:41:08 UTC