[closed] Re: Possible problems with unsupported steps

Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes:

>> Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes:
>> 
>> > But I still think that S0044 should make it more clear that 
>> it is not
>> > only about the XProc schema...
>> 
>> I've added
>> 
>>    In particular, the presence of atomic steps for which there is no
>>    visible declaration may raise this error.
>> 
>> Does that help?
>> 
>
> I think so. Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Vojtech

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A proof tells us where to concentrate
http://nwalsh.com/            | our doubts.-- Anonymous