a few comments on latest draft
clarify the difference of usage of p:input in section 5.1.1.
foreign namespaces
- Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 27 August)
- Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 27 August)
- Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 27 August)
- Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 27 August)
- James Fuller (Wednesday, 27 August)
- Florent Georges (Wednesday, 27 August)
- Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 27 August)
- Florent Georges (Wednesday, 27 August)
- Florent Georges (Wednesday, 27 August)
- James Fuller (Wednesday, 27 August)
- mozer (Wednesday, 27 August)
- James Fuller (Wednesday, 27 August)
- mozer (Wednesday, 27 August)
- Florent Georges (Wednesday, 27 August)
- Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 27 August)
- James Fuller (Tuesday, 26 August)
- Norman Walsh (Tuesday, 26 August)
- James Fuller (Tuesday, 26 August)
more comments on latest xproc II
more PSVI
p:encrypt and p:decrypt
p:pipe convention
rdf accommodation
rdf processing steps
section 3.1 XProc Namespaces oversight ?
what about option values on directly invoked p:declare-step
xml context for p:filter
XProc comment
XProc Minutes 7 Aug 2008
XQuery WG comments on XProc specification
Last message date: Wednesday, 27 August 2008 14:20:36 UTC