RE: XSL/XQuery comments on xml:id

I think I can say on behalf of the XSL and XQuery WGs that this resolution
is satisfactory!

Michael Kay 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Norman Walsh [mailto:Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: 25 January 2005 16:26
> To: Michael Kay
> Cc: public-xml-id@w3.org; 'XPath'
> Subject: Re: XSL/XQuery comments on xml:id
> 
> / "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> was heard to say:
> | The XSL and XQuery working groups, meeting jointly, agreed 
> the following
> | comments on the proposed xml:id specification:
> |
> | (a) The two bullet points in appendix C that attempt to 
> define the impact on
> | XPath 1.0 and 2.0 should be removed before xml:id becomes a 
> Recommendation,
> | to avoid any potential for inconsistency with decisions 
> subsequently made by
> | the XSL and XQuery working groups.
> 
> We've agreed to remove that appendix before publishing the 
> specification
> as a Recommendation. This will be clearly identified in the CR draft.
> 
> | (b) The sentence that appears in both D.1 and D.2 "Such 
> attributes may or
> | may not be recognized processors, including xml:id 
> processors." seems to
> | have gone wrong somewhere. We suspect "recognized" should 
> be "recognized
> | by".
> 
> Fixed.
> 
> Please let me know if this resolution is satisfactory.
> 
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
> 
> -- 
> Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun 
> Microsystems, Inc.
> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
> Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is 
> prohibited.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
> reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
>

Received on Tuesday, 25 January 2005 22:19:11 UTC