- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:12:43 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, public-xml-id@w3.org
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:52:52PM +0000, Ian Hickson wrote: > > No. IMHO, specifications adding layers on top of the XML specification > > should never change the infoset/DOM representation, only augment it. > > I read that as being against the goal of the xml:id spec which is > specifically to force these (reserved so far) attributes to be of type > ID at the infoset level in the absence of DTD. I don't mind them being of type ID, I am merely concerned that they shouldn't have a different representation if you serialise the DOM in an xml:id compliant UA vs in a straight DOM-and-XML compliant UA. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 24 January 2005 20:12:45 UTC