Re: Clarify that fragid support is optional when parse=text

Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name> writes:
> I think that works for me as long as we agree that your statement:
>
>  It is a recoverable error if an implementation does not support
>  fragment identifiers on the resource type being included.
>
> does not contradict the requirement (per the Conformance section)
> that if the fragid is an XPointer Framework or XPointer element()
> scheme, it must be supported.

Aaah. I think I should finesse it a bit. I wasn’t thinking of not
recognizing XML, but the way that’s worded…

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676
www.marklogic.com