- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 09:51:47 -0500
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 16 April 2016 14:52:17 UTC
Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name> writes:
> Well, I think it's still a valid test. Assuming no implementation
> recognizes the value "xtext", and given that the xinclude element
> has no fallback, the result should (still) be a fatal error, right?
Yeah. Fair point. My implementation-defined behavior was to fallback
to parse=xml, but that’s quite easily arguably incorrect.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676
www.marklogic.com
Received on Saturday, 16 April 2016 14:52:17 UTC