- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 09:51:47 -0500
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 16 April 2016 14:52:17 UTC
Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name> writes: > Well, I think it's still a valid test. Assuming no implementation > recognizes the value "xtext", and given that the xinclude element > has no fallback, the result should (still) be a fatal error, right? Yeah. Fair point. My implementation-defined behavior was to fallback to parse=xml, but that’s quite easily arguably incorrect. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 512 761 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Saturday, 16 April 2016 14:52:17 UTC