- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:03:55 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
I believe the email exchange to date--mostly between Simon and myself--covers all the open issues on the Assoc Stylesheet spec. At this point, it is necessary for the rest of the WG to review the emails and take a stand on things. Specifically, there are several places where we need to decide what will be MUSTs and what will be SHOULDs. Of course, the rest of the decisions need to be reviewed and approved also. Please take some time between now and next Wednesday's telcon to review the email (links below) and state your opinion. paul > -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul > Sent: Tuesday, 2009 May 26 13:36 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: XML Core WG Status and Open Actions as of 2009 May 26 > Associating Stylesheets > ----------------------- > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss > > Associating stylesheets with XML version 1.0 is at: > http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/ > > The Errata document is at: > http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata > > Simon has requested we consider revisions; see his email at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Feb/0002 > and his suggested draft at > http://simon.html5.org/specs/xml-stylesheet5 > > See also Simon's email at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Feb/0014 > outlining various issues. > > Paul sent email giving Arbortext's behavior and other comments at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Feb/0022 > > Henry sent email giving Saxon behavior in various erroneous cases at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0025 > > Paul sent email with suggested resolutions at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0029 > and there has been some follow-up email. > > Simon and Paul generally agreed on the resolutions except that > Simon would prefer that some SHOULDs become MUSTs. We need to > have other WG members review the latest email at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0029 > and followups and weigh in on the issues. > > ACTION to everyone besides Simon and Paul: Review the latest > xml-stylesheet email at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0029 > and followups and indicate preferences for resolutions.
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2009 13:05:29 UTC