Re: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Grosso, Paul writes:

> Things are looking good, but one more housekeeping chore.  Re:
>
> We closed NPE20 and NPE22 with no action needed; Paul informed I18N:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0055
>
> ACTION to Henry:  Close NPE20 and NPE22 with no action/changes.

Done == recorded in [1].

> We had CONSENSUS not to add ns prefix undeclaration to NS 1.0 3rd Ed.
> Paul informed XML Security at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0054
> and Frederick replied (with no concerns) at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0058

Not clear what you want me to do wrt this one. . .

ht

[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKbbA1kjnJixAXWBoRArEuAJ0VtBzfl6u+k/OXgUBPYLc1qIv2KACeOGDp
LscrUQAb7842ptcYsjgcGB8=
=g11i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Monday, 27 July 2009 13:49:16 UTC