- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:32:18 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, 2009 July 22 9:23 > To: Grosso, Paul > Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition > > Grosso, Paul writes: > > 1. We turned "attributes unique" into an NSC, but there is no > > corresponding erratum for this. This doesn't really bother > > me, but I thought I'd mention it. > > Hmm. That's NPE29 [1], which I _thought_ we had approved. . . Yes, > we did [2], I just failed to update the NPE and add an actual erratum > - -- done now. Henry, Things are looking good, but one more housekeeping chore. Re: The NS PE doc is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html We closed NPE20 and NPE22 with no action needed; Paul informed I18N: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0055 We had CONSENSUS not to add ns prefix undeclaration to NS 1.0 3rd Ed. Paul informed XML Security at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0054 and Frederick replied (with no concerns) at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0058 ACTION to Henry: Close NPE20 and NPE22 with no action/changes. paul
Received on Monday, 27 July 2009 13:32:58 UTC